!!!UPDATE!!! The Ely Times did eventually publish this LTE. Thank you Ely Times.
For thousands of years, pinion trees have provided a sustainable source of food for our ancestors, the Great Basin Shoshone. In fact, without pine nuts, our ancestors would not have survived our harsh Winters. These trees were so important they are considered “sacred.” But apparently now; they are in the way of unsustainable exploitation in the name of “development.” But the developers aren't paying for this. We taxpayers are. Our money is being used to kill naturally growing forests in the Orwellian name of Pinion/Juniper “Restoration.”
For thousands of years, pinion trees have provided a sustainable source of food for our ancestors, the Great Basin Shoshone. In fact, without pine nuts, our ancestors would not have survived our harsh Winters. These trees were so important they are considered “sacred.” But apparently now; they are in the way of unsustainable exploitation in the name of “development.” But the developers aren't paying for this. We taxpayers are. Our money is being used to kill naturally growing forests in the Orwellian name of Pinion/Juniper “Restoration.”
But
“restoration” isn't about saving the sage grouse. Even after all
these years, we have still seen no definitive evidence that sage
grouse populations are helped at all.
And
this isn't about fire suppression. Do the watergrabbers really think
we're stupid enough to think that brush doesn't burn? Actually, the
biggest difference between trees and brush is that trees have deeper
roots. Face it, this is about groundwater. And to prove my point; in
places in the West where there were no trees, they've taken out the
brush.
It's
not like they're “selectively” cutting down every third tree
(which we personally don't have a problem with). This is clear-cut
logging! When they're done, every tree is gone. They
even come back later to kill baby trees so that no trees will come
back. Essentially, this is a blatant effort to create areas of
localized forest extinction! This has gotten totally out of hand.
Even the heads of the Federal Agencies tasked with protecting this
land are often making backroom deals with the watergrabbers.
Moreover,
this forest ecocide is bad for our local economy – because chopped
down forests are not tourist attractions.
Pinion/Juniper
“restoration” is a lame excuse for a corrupt practice –
deforestation for groundwater. But deforestation is just one facet of
our short-sighted and inevitably self-destructive rule of (corrupt)
water law system – meticulously written by the greedy to enrich
themselves at extraordinary expense to everyone and everything else.
Examples:
It's legal in Nevada to take the groundwater away from everything
natural that relies on it. Twice now, there have been efforts in the
Nevada Legislature to commodify water – leaving it open for
speculation and hyperinflation bubbles. There are already 50 water
basins in Nevada that are over-allocated. And it is literally the
State Water Engineer's job to just keep giving away more and more of
our water (that is commonly owned)... I didn't vote for
this. In fact, Nevadans have never voted on what Nevada Water Law
should be. And obviously, if the watergrabbers get their way, we
never will.
Rick and Delaine Spilsbury