Tuesday, March 06, 2007

Here's Why

LS Power/Dynegy are not here to help us. They will pay the taxes that they have to – and they will hire a handful of locals, IF they have a need. But they are here for only one reason; to turn our natural wealth into money for themselves. They are here because we have the cleanest air that they can pollute.


During its 50 years of planned operations, this White Pine Energy “Associates” coal fired power plant will burn approximately 350 million tons of coal. That is literally a mountain of coal. None of the chemical byproducts from burning this mountain of coal will just disappear. That which does not end up discarded in a 1500 acre toxic sludge landfill is still far more than our community and our environment can handle.


Some of the chemicals that the LS Power coal fired power plant will emit into our air during its 50 years of operation are:


Carbon Monoxide – 35 parts per million can cause headaches and dizziness within 8 hours

400 parts per million can be fatal

LS Power intends to release 500,000 tons of Carbon Monoxide into our air.


Sulfuric Acid – One of the primary components of acid rain. Acid rain has been shown to have adverse impacts on forests, freshwaters, and soils. In some cases, whole areas of forest have died from acid rain. Acid rain kills off insect and aquatic lifeforms (including fish). Acid rain depletes minerals from the soil. Acid rain causes damage to buildings. And although the coal industry has been able to cast doubt on the obvious fact that pumping acid into our environment is bad for our health, chemicals related to acid rain have been shown to cause illness and premature deaths in humans.

LS Power intends to release 11,000 tons of Sulfuric Acid into our air.

They also intend to release 300,000 tons of Sulfur Oxides

and 240,000 tons of Nitrogen Oxides


Particulates – These are those chemicals associated with acid rain that cause illness and premature deaths.

LS Power intends to release 135,000 tons of particulates into our air.


Mercury – Many of the ocean's fish are laced with unsafe levels of mercury. We all know where that mercury is coming from. Just one drop of mercury in a large lake can make all of the fish there unsafe to eat. Infinitesimal amounts of mercury can cause learning, language, and motor skills damage. Mercury can also permanently damage the nervous, cardiovascular, immune, and reproductive systems.

LS Power intends to release 7.5 tons of mercury into our air.



Lead – Lead is a known poison. Lead has been known to cause mental retardation, schizophrenia, reproductive problems, physical illness, and death. Consumption of lead is dangerous in the milligrams.

LS Power intends to release 40 tons of lead into our air.


Arsenic – Arsenic is a notorious poison that leads to death from multi-system organ failure. Arsenic is a category 1 carcinogen. The World Health Organization considers water unsafe at anything over 10 parts per billion.

LS Power intends to release 95 tons of arsenic into our air.


Benzene – Breathing benzene can cause drowsiness, dizziness, rapid heart rate, headaches, tremors, confusion, and unconsciousness. Eating or drinking foods containing high levels of benzene can cause vomiting, irritation of the stomach, dizziness, sleepiness, convulsions, rapid heart rate, and death. Benzene is a human carcinogen. The EPA has set the maximum level of benzene in drinking water at 5 micro grams per liter.

LS Power intends to release 300 tons of benzene into our air.


Benzyl Chloride – This dangerous gas has been use as a weapon in war.

LS Power intends to release 165 tons of benzyl chloride into our air.


Hydrogen Fluoride – Hydrogen Fluoride is toxic even in small amounts when ingested or absorbed through the skin. Exposure to hydrogen fluoride can lead to extreme throbbing pain, metabolic changes, and even death.

LS Power intends to release 2,300 tons of hydrogen fluoride into our air.


Acetaldehyde – Acetaldehyde is toxic, an irritant, and a probable carcinogen.

LS Power intends to release 135 tons of acetaldehyde into our air.


Methyl Chloride – Chronic exposure to methyl chloride has been linked to birth defects in mice. In humans, exposure to methyl chloride during pregnancy may cause the fetus' lower spinal column, pelvis, and legs to form incorrectly.

LS Power intends to release 125 tons of methyl chloride into our air.


Acrolein – Acrolein is such a severe pulmonary irritant that it has been used as a chemical weapon during World War I. Acrolein is a suspected human carcinogen. Acrolein concentrations of 2 parts per million are immediately dangerous to life.

LS Power intends to release 70 tons of acrolein into our air.


Carbon Dioxide – Although carbon dioxide is not toxic, it is very dangerous to the balance of our environment. The massive amounts of carbon dioxide that humanity has been pumping into our atmosphere is resulting in:

  • The intensity and duration of hurricanes doubling since the 1970's.

  • 400,000 square miles of Arctic sea ice has melted in the last 30 years.

  • There isn't a glacier on the planet that isn't significantly smaller than it was a hundred years ago. And the meltwater from some of these glaciers feed rivers that millions depend on.

  • The National Center for Atmospheric Research has found that the density of the outer atmosphere is predicted to reduce by 3% by 2017 due to carbon dioxide emissions.

  • The Center for Health and the Global Environment has reported that mosquito-borne diseases, such as malaria, have spread to once cooler climates.

  • The National Center for Atmospheric Research has found that the percentage of the Earth's land area stricken by serious drought more than doubled from the 1970's to the early 2000's.

  • The El Nino has caused a drought for two years in the Amazon rain forest. Rivers have dried up, and wildfires have burned large areas. If this continues this year, an unstoppable cycle of deforestation may begin.

  • In 2002 and 2006, the Western US experienced some of the worst wildfires in the last 50 years. The National Academy of Sciences have published data that show that Western wildfires have been linked to North Atlantic temperatures. Nature magazine has published evidence that this is happening on other locations on the planet also.

  • The National Oceanography Centre found a 30% reduction in the currents that carry water from the Gulf Stream, which raises fears that Western Europe might plunge into a mini ice age.

  • Researchers from the Scripps Institution of Oceanography have found clear evidence that the top half-mile of the ocean has warmed dramatically in the past forty years. Nature magazine has published an article that points out that the Oceans' phytoplankton are in decline, and that the productivity of the Global oceans is tightly linked to climate change. Phytoplankton absorb carbon dioxide.

  • The National Academy of Sciences published a report that Global warming was responsible for permanently killing off of 90% of the coral in a part of the Indian Ocean. The World Conservation Union warns that 20% of the Earth's coral reefs have already effectively been destroyed and that half of the world's coral reefs may die within the next 40 years.

  • The Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory has found that the world's oceans are 30% more acidic from more carbonic acid (due to the buildup of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere). This acid is accumulating 100 times faster than at any time in a million years. At this rate, within the next 50 to 100 years seawater will dissolve sea shells.

  • Divers from the University of California, Santa Barbara have already observed methane blowouts from the sea floor. They warn that if Global warming continues, we may reach a tipping point wherein frozen hydrocarbons will release tremendous amounts of greenhouse gases that could accelerate Global warming out of control.

  • The Institute of Arctic Biology has found that frozen bubbles in Siberian lakes are releasing methane at rates five times higher than previously estimated. As permafrost continues to thaw, tens of thousands of teragrams of methane could be released into the atmosphere, accelerating Global warming.

  • The Association of British Insurers has estimated that global warming will lead to $27 billion worth of storm damage annually by 2080.

  • Nature magazine and National Geographic have published articles that predict that by 2050 a million species may go extinct due to human emitted greenhouse gases.

  • An internal Pentagon report has warned that Global climate change will soon lead to drought, famine, and widespread warfare as countries begin to fight over scarce water, food, and energy resources. The report argues that climate change, “should be elevated beyond a scientific debate to US national security concern.”

LS Power intends to emit over 500 million tons of carbon dioxide into our air.


That's right. This is about more than poisoning a few miners, Mormons, and Indians out here in the middle of nowhere. This is about the future of America, our civilization, and even humanity. We can do the right thing, and generate electricity using safe and sustainable technology – or we can allow these modern day carpetbaggers to ruin our lives.


Saturday, March 03, 2007

That Went Over Like a Lead Balloon!

Sierra Pacific held a public meeting today in Ely and invited everyone. There was a big ad in the local paper, the Ely Times. The attendance was impressive, but not overwhelming.


NOTICE: We really need to get out to the next one. This will be the most important Public Hearing held this year. This next meeting is the final regulatory hoop LS Power/Dynegy has to jump through. Speak up now for our fresh air, or live with smog for the next 50 years.

Thursday, March 8, 6:00 pm, the Bristlecone Convention Center, Ely, NV.

Nevada Division of Environmental Protection – air pollution hearing.


For those of you who couldn't make it to today's meeting; there appeared to by about an 80/20 percent ratio of those who were against the coal fired power plant and those who seemed to be for it. The reason I use the term “seemed” is because of something strange that happened early on in the group presentation. Dennis Sims (from Sierra Pacific) was well into his speech about how grateful we should be to have this coal fired power plant, when he showed us a picture of what the plant would look like. It was an artist's rendition. Quite attractive, if you're into big industrial buildings. But something was missing. Sure, the sky was as blue... as it is now. But we knew they would leave out the smog. That's the beauty of an artist”s rendition. No... Something else was missing. Oh, yeah! The toxic sludge landfill was missing! Being a stickler for detail, I asked Mr. Sims where the landfill was in the picture. He tried to brush me off, as I expected. But what I didn't expect, was a chorus of about four or five voices saying pretty much the same thing. “How rude.” It seemed like an over reaction. Yes, I was a little rude. But the comments from the audience sounded so staged. Maybe it was just me. But I knew that I would never see this picture again. This was my only chance to help out Mr. Sims, and point out his missing landfill. So, I said; “The landfill is the biggest thing on your (technical) drawings. Where is it? He finally conceded that it was in back, where the artist had drawn open range. A 1500 acre oversight? I think not.


Later on I couldn't help but point out that they had no idea of what to do with the carbon dioxide – if they ever separate it out... How rude of me.


As the meeting dragged on... The lady in the chair next to me remarked that they were trying to bore us into submission... Oh. I almost fell asleep there. Which is just where they wanted us – so that they could drop the bombshell – and we might miss it. But we didn't. During the question and answer period, someone asked just how much coal were they going to burn? The first answer was; Oh about one, one and a half train loads a day. What? What was that? Did he say TRAINLOADS? A lady asked; “How many train car loads is that?” A few numbers were tossed about until an average of 220 TRAIN CAR LOADS A DAY! And then a guy asked how many tons that was. They're going to burn EIGHT MILLION TONS OF COAL A YEAR! There was an audible gasp from the crowd... as if they had, all of a sudden, been enlightened.

Friday, February 23, 2007

Why the Sierra Pacific coal fired power plant is a bad idea.

The coal fired power plant at the Ely Energy Center planned by Sierra Pacific Power/Nevada Power (SPPCO) is an outrage. The big cities of the West have despoiled their own environment, and now they intend to pillage the rest of the West too. These coal fired monstrosities are going to turn our pristine valleys into polluted dust bowls for billions of dollars the local community will never see. They aren't here because the care about us. They're here for what they can take from us. “Clean Coal” is an oxymoron. If these things were as clean as they try to make them sound, they'd build them in their own back yard.


AIR POLLUTION:

30 years ago, Americans learned that coal fired power plants were dirty, dangerous, and ultimately destructive to the natural world that supports our economy and our civilization. Just because the coal industry can now keep a couple of chemicals from leaving their smokestacks, doesn't mean that they've cleaned up their act.


We've been told that scrubbers will reduce air emissions of sulfur by over 95%. That sounds great, until we realize that SPPCO intends to burn 4 million tons of coal a year. The 5% of the coal effluents that gets past the pollution controls amounts to 200,000 TONS of coal burnt with no abatement. That's right, we will see sulfur smog from the equivalent of a coal fired power plant that burns 200,000 tons of coal per year! The McGill copper smelter only burned 70,000 tons a year. Expect over twice the acid rain – from just the first phase of the SPPCO plant.


The story is essentially the same for Nitrates. Even if they find a way to reduce Nitrates by 98%, that still amounts to burning 80,000 tons of coal per year unabated – more than the McGill copper smelter – before it utilized any pollution controls.


Let me remind you that the Ely Energy Center is not the only coal fired game in town. LS Power already plans to burn just as much, if not significantly more coal. If one were to add up all of the coal that LS Power and SPPCO intend to burn eventually, it will amount to approximately 12 to 15 million tons per year. That's about 500 rail cars of coal a day! Literally mountains of coal will be burned here. This is insane!


But hey, the coal industry claims that they can clean up 80% of the mercury in the newer coal fired power plants. That's not so great an accomplishment. What this means is that 20% of that 500 rail cars a day won't get cleaned up. What this means is that approximately 100 rail cars of coal a day will spew out mercury unabated! This is practically guaranteeing serious health and environmental problems in the Ely area. Even a 700 foot tall smokestack will only send some of this smog into the next valleys... to damage their health too. Mercury is a very serious health risk. We're already commonly finding toxic levels of mercury in our oceans' fish. Where do you think this mercury came from? No living thing on the planet is safe.


What SPPCO doesn't remind us of is that the 80% of mercury that doesn't make it out of the smokestack doesn't just disappear. For every reduction they've made in air pollution, there is a concentration of toxic pollutants on the ground. Whatever doesn't go into the air, ends up in the SPPCO (toxic sludge) landfill.


By the time SPPCO has retired their coal fired power plant, They will have effectively contaminated over half of the power plant property – resulting in up to a 3,000 acre no-man's land – toxic for essentially... ever. Unlike radioactive waste, these chemicals don't have half lives. If SPPCO could keep this landfill contained, some of the toxic chemicals would remain for millions of years. But of course, SPPCO won't be able to keep them contained. Perfect containment simply isn't physically possible. The barriers will actually begin to leak as soon as material is put in the landfill. It will take a while before the leaks gets completely past the barriers, but they will. It's just straight forward basic physics. The real question about leaks in any containment system is not when. It is how much and how fast. There is no way that SPPCO can guarantee that they will be around when the inevitable leaks do occur. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised to find out that's actually what their betting on – that substantial leaks won't occur before they exploit the area for all the money they can get, and then get out before the clean-up.


What's been rarely mentioned by SPPCO is what will happen to all those other chemicals associated with burning coal. What about lead, arsenic, vanadium, barium, zinc, nickel, hydrogen fluoride, hydrochloric acid, selenium, and as many as 50 others? Yes, some of these chemicals may get captured and stored in the (toxic sludge) landfill. But, many of these chemicals will escape totally unhindered. Some of these pollutants will comprise of all of that particular chemical component within the 200 million tons of coal SPPCO intends to burn during the life of the first phase of the Ely Energy Center coal fired power plant. How much arsenic do you think is in 200 million tons of coal?


Over the life of the first phase of the Ely Energy Center coal fired power plant, 700 million tons of Carbon Dioxide will be released. (Carbon's atomic weight is 12, plus 2 Oxygen atoms, atomic weight 16, results in 3.6 times the mass of the carbon in the coal burned to carbon dioxide) This is the equivalent to 2 million SUVs running on White Pine County's roads for the next 50 years. SPPCO has no realistic plans for dealing with carbon dioxide. They have left a spot open on the property so that maybe someday, when they get around to it; they can think about what they might want to put there. At the scoping meeting they indicated that they had no plans for the pipeline, pumps, or destination for the carbon dioxide. Think about it. What difference does it make if someday they might be able to separate the carbon dioxide, if they have no place to ship it. SPPCO is not going to do a thing about carbon dioxide, and I predict (with 99% certainty) that they never will.


EXTREME CLIMATE CHANGE:

In the US, coal fired power plants' carbon dioxide emissions amount to over a third of the nation's total carbon dioxide emissions. SPPCO wants to increase that – for the next 50 years. The European Union, on the other hand, has just agreed to decrease carbon dioxide emissions by 20% by 2020. Apparently, SPPCO wants us to be more like a third world nation than the developed countries. Our nation's big cities are treating our rural areas like third world nations. This is what colonialism looks like. The people who live in the big cities don't want this. But the powerful people who wish to exploit us all can only think about the money. Ultimately, the pollution from these coal fired power plants will hurt us all.

For decades, scientists have been warning us about the Greenhouse Effect, Global Warming, or (extreme) Climate Change (if you wish to call it that). Almost every scientist that has studied carbon dioxide pollution says things are getting very dangerous for humanity, and life on Earth. Six former EPA leaders say that the US is not doing enough. National Academy of Sciences have concluded that human influenced Global warming has resulted in the past few decades being the warmest in the past 400 years. NASA's chief atmospheric scientist has shown that carbon dioxide levels are the highest, by far, than they have been in 650,000 years – and rising. The American Meteorological Society, the American Geophysical Union, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, National Science Foundation, the Union of Concerned Scientists, and the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have all issued statements in recent years concluding that evidence for human modification of climate change is compelling. Even George W. Bush now admits we have a problem.


  • The intensity and duration of hurricanes has doubled since the 1970's.

  • 400,000 square miles of Arctic sea ice has melted in the last 30 years.

  • There isn't a glacier on the planet that isn't significantly smaller than it was a hundred years ago. And the meltwater from some of these glaciers feed rivers that millions depend on.

  • The National Center for Atmospheric Research has found that the density of the outer atmosphere is predicted to reduce by 3% by 2017 due to carbon dioxide emissions.

  • The Center for Health and the Global Environment has reported that mosquito-borne diseases, such as malaria, have spread to once cooler climates.

  • The National Center for Atmospheric Research has found that the percentage of the Earth's land area stricken by serious drought more than doubled from the 1970's to the early 2000's.

  • The El Nino has caused a drought for two years in the Amazon rain forest. Rivers have dried up, and wildfires have burned large areas. If this continues this year, an unstoppable cycle of deforestation will begin.

  • In 2002 and 2006, the Western US experienced some of the worst wildfires in the last 50 years. The National Academy of Sciences have published data that show that Western wildfires have been linked to North Atlantic temperatures. Nature magazine has published evidence that this is happening on other locations on the planet also.

  • The National Oceanography Centre found a 30% reduction in the currents that carry water from the Gulf Stream, which raises fears that Western Europe might plunge into a mini ice age.

  • Researchers from the Scripps Institution of Oceanography have found clear evidence that the top half-mile of the ocean has warmed dramatically in the past forty years. Nature magazine has published an article that points out that the Oceans' phytoplankton are in decline, and that the productivity of the Global oceans is tightly linked to climate change. Phytoplankton absorb carbon dioxide.

  • The National Academy of Sciences published a report that Global warming was responsible for permanently killing off of 90% of the coral in a part of the Indian Ocean. The World Conservation Union warns that 20% of the Earth's coral reefs have already effectively been destroyed and that half of the world's coral reefs may die within the next 40 years.

  • The Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory has found that the world's oceans are 30% more acidic from more carbonic acid (due to the buildup of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere). This acid is accumulating 100 times faster than at any time in a million years. At this rate, within the next 50 to 100 years seawater will dissolve sea shells.

  • Divers from the University of California, Santa Barbara have already observed methane blowouts from the sea floor. They warn that if Global warming continues, we may reach a tipping point wherein frozen hydrocarbons will release tremendous amounts of greenhouse gases that could accelerate Global warming out of control.

  • The Institute of Arctic Biology has found that frozen bubbles in Siberian lakes are releasing methane at rates five times higher than previously estimated. As permafrost continues to thaw, tens of thousands of teragrams of methane could be released into the atmosphere, accelerating Global warming.

  • The Association of British Insurers has estimated that global warming will lead to $27 billion worth of storm damage annually by 2080.

  • Nature magazine and National Geographic have published articles that predict that by 2050 a million species may go extinct due to human emitted greenhouse gases.

  • An internal Pentagon report has warned that Global climate change will soon lead to drought, famine, and widespread warfare as countries begin to fight over scarce water, food, and energy resources. The report argues that climate change, “should be elevated beyond a scientific debate to US national security concern.”


In case you weren't paying attention, this is a very serious matter. We're not talking about a few jobs here. We're talking about the near future economic health of the planet. We're not just talking about a possible economic recession. We're talking about billions suffering. We're even talking about the possibility of the collapse of our civilization, maybe even the possibility of the extinction of humanity.


There. I said it. I just said what what nobody wants to talk about. We're likely in very deep trouble. The naysayers may claim that I am panicking. But, consider your source. Nobody is paying me to tell you everything is going to be alright. Nobody is paying me to tell you that burning millions of tons of coal won't hurt anything. I don't stand to make billions by telling you what they want you to hear.


Our civilization will fail if we continue to value money over wealth. White Pine County has an abundance of natural wealth that we should never sell out for any amount of money. This is my homeland. This area is sacred to me. For people to despoil it all for a profit – in fact, just to maximize a profit, seems an act of a psychopath.


THE WATER GRAB:

One more thing. As if all this pollution isn't enough, SPPCO intends to take 8,000 acre feet of water too. That's enough water to supply 40,000 people. Those people may not be here now, but they will never have the opportunity to be here if that water gets used up. It's as if there is a conspiracy to keep White Pine County weak, so that outsiders can take what they want, and leave us their waste.


Nevada Power and Southern Nevada Water Authority have been working closely together for decades. We know that SNWA wants water in Spring Valley. NV Power refused to build a power plant in Spring Valley. Now they want water from Steptoe Valley, Duck Creek Basin, Butte Valley, and maybe Smith Valley. Effectively, this is just an extension of the water grab.


They must realize that this is the desert. You don't waste water in the desert.


CONCLUSION:

All of this is completely avoidable. Other forms of profitable power generation exist that leave no pollutants behind and use no water. The winds in Spring Valley are strong. The solar energy in White Pine County is better than average. The technology to utilize the kinetic energy of the Earth improves every year. Don't believe the coal salesmen. Don't take advice from those who wish to take our wealth. Clean energy is practical. Dams have been generating electricity for decades.


SPPCO has better alternatives. Maybe not quite as profitable in the short term, but why should we be so concerned about maximizing their quarterly profits if they're not concerned about our lives.


The Ely Energy Center is a hideous idea based upon short term thinking. SPPCO has forsaken common sense for bottom line mentality. Residents of White Pine County don't need the power, don't want to lose the water, and resent our homeland being polluted so that Las Vegas, Reno, and California can get cheap electricity. Some of us even realize that these areas won't be getting cheap electricity. Coal prices invariably will rise. And with only one major power line delivering the power (the Frontier Line, which will be privately owned) – it will be far too tempting to be like Enron, and pinch off supply to raise prices. What's worse, is that it appears that the utility companies involved with the Frontier (power) Line intend to force California into rescinding their mandate to not buy coal power. Of all the power these companies plan to generate on the Frontier Line, 98 percent will be from coal. California may want clean power, but the utility companies appear to have no intentions of selling it – unless we stop them.


I see this as project as failing on all counts. If we continue on this path; we will ruin the environment of the West, energy customers in the cities will be subject to exorbitant electricity prices, our government agencies will be corrupted, and ultimately, the utility companies will suffer – when the price of solar energy drops significantly below the price of coal generated power (which, without coal and railroad subsidies, would already be happening).


Let's not try to fix short term financial issues by creating long term environmental problems.


Monday, February 19, 2007

Two Critically Important Dates

February 26 - is the final day to input public comments to the BLM concerning
the Sierra Pacific/Ely Energy Center coal fired power plant. Be sure to send in
your comments concerning the Environmental Impact Statement before the
scoping period ends. You can mail or hand deliver your input to:
Doris Metcalf
Bureau of Land Management
Ely Field Office
HC 33 Box 33500
Ely, Nevada 89301
Attn: EEC EIS
You can also e-mail your scoping comments to:
eec_eis@nv.blm.gov

March 8 - is the public hearing for the LS Power/Dynegy coal fired power plant by
the State of Nevada, Division of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air
Pollution Control. If you have anything to say about the future of air quality in
White Pine County (and the planet), this may be your last chance. The hearing
will be held on Thursday, March 8, in Ely at 6:00 pm at:
Bristlecone Convention Center
Bristlecone Room
150 Sixth Street
Ely, NV 89301

There is hope, if we take the initiative.


Monday, February 05, 2007

Scoping Meeting Announcement!!!

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is asking for the public's input in the preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Ely Energy Center, a coal-fired power-generating catastrophe.


Please. Please. Please... Go to the meeting.


In Ely; Wednesday, Feb. 7, Bristlecone Convention Center, 150 6th Street.


I will be going to the meeting in Alamo, so I won't make it to the Ely meeting.

If you may, please ask these questions for me:



How many tons of coal per day will this plant be burning?


The LS Power pamphlet states that they will be saving 80% of their water. Sierra Pacific claims that they will only save 50%. Will you explain the discrepancy?


How much water from Duck Creek Basin are you attempting to attain?


How do you plan to dispose of your by products?

What size sludge pond will Nevada be left with?


A representative from Sierra Pacific has claimed that your company will not be selling power to Southern Nevada Water Authority for their Groundwater Development Project (Eastern Nevada water grab pipeline network). Locals suspect that this is a lie. We suspect that Sierra Pacific will just sell the power to a middleman, who will then sell power to the Southern Nevada Water Authority. Can you convince us otherwise?


So far, we feel that we've been given the “really big sale” promotion. Sierra Pacific has been telling us how much we'll save – but haven't been willing to tell us how much this will actually cost us. In units we can understand, how much air pollution will this power plant generate?

Nitrates

Sulfates

Mercury

Lead

Arsenic

Vanadium

Barium

Zinc

Nickel

Hydrogen Fluoride

Hydrochloric Acid

Selenium

Others


If Sierra Pacific acquires water rights to White Pine County water, what will happen to those water rights once the power plants are retired?

Are there any laws to prevent SPPCO from selling the water acquired for generating purposes?


Thank you

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

Public Hearing

The Nevada Division of Environmental Protection will be holding a public hearing concerning the coal fired power plant just north of Ely, Nevada - brought to us by White Pine Energy Associates/LS Power/Dynegy. This may be our last chance to speak out about this huge mistake.

The hearing will be held on Thursday, March 8, 2007 - in Ely, Nevada at 6:00 pm at the Bristlecone Convention Center. Please be there.

click here to see the public announcement


Sunday, January 21, 2007

No Shoot Foot video documentary





Script from No Shoot Foot (with links to sources):


Title scene – Spring Valley


Nevada Ghost Towns

Nevada is full of boom and bust ghost towns – places that ran out of the resources that sustained them. The miners who once lived in these towns preferred to move on to the next mine rather than learn how to live sustainably there. That was their choice. And they could. There were other mines... But what happens when there are no other places to move to? Humanity has populated almost every livable place on this planet. We have run out of desirable places to move away to. And if the big cities have their way, there will be even fewer places in the future. Like the ancient city/states in search of conquest, they wish to drain Rural areas of what resources they have. And now; in return, send them their cities' waste, their industrial waste, and even their nuclear waste.


Ely homes

One of the towns that didn't become a ghost town in Rural Nevada is a small community in White Pine County called Ely. About 5,000 people live here – plainly only a tiny fraction of the populations of the cities hundreds of miles away. This community's remoteness has served both as a hindrance and an asset over the years. Recently, Ely's economy has been doing rather well. People have started to move here to breath the clean air, enjoy the natural surroundings, and get away from the high stress lifestyle of the cities.


Ruth Open Pit Mine

There is also a profitable mine nearby. In the past, only minerals were valuable enough to take, and their extraction only ruined limited sections of the local environment.


Shoshone Ponds in Spring Valley

and Steptoe Valley Power plant site from Duck Creek Basin

But, times have changed. Las Vegas wants Rural Nevada's sparse water supplies, and power companies want to take even more water to operate up to four coal fired power plants – just in Ely's White Pine County.


Nevada/Vermont maps

The total area effected by the water grabs will approach the size of Vermont. If you consider land effected, this will be the largest ground water grab in the nation's history.


Map of water grab intentions (excluding Spring and Snake Valleys – and valley effected by the coal fired power plants)

Southern Nevada Water Authority wants to drill for what little water the high deserts of Rural Nevada have accumulated over tens of thousands of years and pipe it to Las Vegas, a city right next to the Colorado River. And Sierra Pacific wants to build a coal fired power plant to run the pumps. Southern Nevada Water Authority, LS Power, and Sierra Pacific claim that turning Rural Nevada's valleys into polluted dust bowls is the best option. They infer that it is the cheapest and most profitable. But for whom?


North Spring Valley

Taking Rural Nevada's water and leaving toxic waste can't possibly be profitable, in the long run, for Rural Nevada, the State of Nevada, or the West, for that matter.


Glenn Siding

This is Glenn Siding. It is near the primary location for where Sierra Pacific and Nevada Power intend to ship in train loads full of coal for their power plant. LS Power (now Dynergy) intends to build another coal fired power plant just a few miles north of here. As of now, this area is nothing more than a wide spot on a retired railroad track – hundreds of miles from any city. The railroad ties have rotted, the steel is rusted, and much of the rail will likely not be usable. Even the base needs extensive work. Repairs will cost a million dollars a mile.

There is no coal here. There is no trained work force. There is no industrial infrastructure. And most importantly, there are virtually no customers. Of course, the utility companies see this as a positive trait. There are very few people here to stop them.

As you can see in this scene, even in the dead of winter there is plenty of wind and sun – which, of course, would not have to be brought in by train.


Antelope

Although the people who wish to exploit this area want us to believe that Nevada is essentially a wasteland, the locals know better. This heard of antelope was filmed on the exact location of the proposed power plant. Not only would they lose their home, but also the water that feeds the plant life they feed on.


The winter habitat for herds of elk and deer are also at risk. With the coal fired power plants, Rural Nevada will have to endure yet another water pipeline network, into three more valleys. Sierra Pacific claims that they will utilize “only” half the water of a conventional power plant. But... LS Power claims that they will only use 20% - "only" about a billion gallons a year. Remember, windmills would use none.


Elk

Sierra Pacific claims that they will “only” require 8,000 acre feet of water per year – for their first power plant. That would only support over 40,000 people – or an ecosystem, as it does now.

The physics of drawing water from wells is simple:

Like a well in an aquifer, no matter how deep you put a straw in a cup, the water drops at the top. This kills the native vegetation in the valleys – which also kills what feeds on that vegetation.


Steptoe Valley (looking towards the LS Power plant site)

What the utility companies don't want us to know; is that if we allow even one of the coal fired power plants, we may as well say goodbye to most of the herds of antelope, elk, and deer that live here in the Winter.


Website Titles

But, that may be the least of our worries. Increased carbon dioxide in our atmosphere is already increasing the acidity of our oceans, causing wild fires worldwide, perilously changing our weather patterns, putting as many as a million species at risk, and endangering the world's coastal cities with total destruction.


Beetle infested trees, snow covered mountains, Brian Head

This is a pine forest in Rural Nevada. As you can see, the pine beetles have already killed a significant portion of the forest. Scientists believe that at least part of the reason the pine beetle are such a scourge now is because of Global warming. 2006 was the warmest year in recorded history in the United States – 2.2 degrees warmer than average. Our winters are just not a cold as they used to be – and consequently, not as many pine beetles die off. This destruction isn't just happening in Nevada. It's happening from Arizona to Canada. Brian Head, Utah used to look like this. Within 10 years, all of this species of pine were dead. Our Douglas Fir likely have less than 10 years left to live. And, of course, more carbon in the atmosphere will likely reduce that window.


Coal fired power plant at Page, Arizona

They tell us that the new coal fired power plants are not like coal fired power plants any more. They tell us that they now have “clean” coal – which takes the pollution out of the air and puts it in a sludge pond. They tell us that they will be able to burn over 10,000 tons of coal a day, per plant – without using the latest technology, with no significant consequences. And they tell us that since the cost of building coal gasification is 20 percent higher, it's just not practical yet. Who are they?

We will have a hard time knowing who these people are, because the Energy Policy Act of 2003 allows power companies to (act like Enron and) set up multiple subsidiaries to blur their financial reports.


Dick Cheney and his Energy Advisory Team

What we do know is that two Peabody Coal executives were named to President Bush's Energy Advisory Team after coal companies gave $900,000 to Republican coffers. We also know that four days after Vice President Dick Cheney announced the administration's new energy plan, Peabody, a privately held company for 120 years, went public, and sold stock for $420 million, $60 million more than expected.

Peabody Group is the largest coal company on the planet, and they presently lease almost a third of the mines in the Powder River Basin – where the Ely power plants will get their coal.

You may not be familiar with Peabody's history of coal mining on the Navajo Reservation. But, the Navajo and Hopi people will never forget.


Dying forest on the Navajo Reservation

They have witnessed their water wells drained. Their springs have dried up. And their forests are dieing. Peabody Coal took 4000 acre feet per year. This was only half of what just one of the four Ely coal fired power plants will take!

Peabody supplied the Navajos' coal to the Mojave Power Plant, in Laughlin – which was part owned by Nevada Power – now a subsidiary of Sierra Pacific Resources.

The intriguing aspect of these relationships are financial deals with a big New York bank; Lehman Brothers. Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific have both been dealing with Lehman Brothers. Recently, Lehman Brothers loaned Sierra Pacific Resources $335 million dollars in unsecured notes. And yes, this is the same Lehman Brothers that is the largest investor in Peabody Energy Co.

In case you didn't know, Lehman Brothers does not have the best reputation on Wall Street. They were recently charged with violations of the 1933 Securities Act, and agreed to pay $222.5 million to settle a class-action lawsuit brought by mislead investors of Enron.


Laughlin coal fired power plant

Part of the reason Sierra Pacific and LS Power want to build coal fired power plants near Ely is because the Mojave Generating Station, a coal fired power plant in Laughlin, was shut down. And why was it forced to shut down?... Because it was one of the dirtiest coal fired power plants in the country. And the owners, including Nevada Power, would not install the pollution control equipment required – even though they had promised to six years earlier. The plant now sits idle. Its toxic sludge sits nearby, waiting for the day the containment barriers leak, and its toxic contents leak into the Colorado River. Ely is next.


Hurricane Katrina

But, Ely isn't the only place environmentally at risk.


Powder River

Those of us living in Nevada haven't thought much about the ranches in Wyoming that now have mines on them. The ranchers there didn't have the mineral rights to their property. Now, their ranches will never be the same. We need to pay attention to their predicament. The environmental destruction there is an indicator of the attitudes of this industry and our economic system. By law, a corporation has to maximize its profits for its shareholders. But, where are the laws that say its customers or the community have to be considered? Where are the institutions that were supposed to protect us? Maybe the Department of Interior's own inspector general, Earl Devaney can explain. He recently testified that “Short of a crime, anything goes at the highest levels of the Department of the Interior.”

And things could get worse. There already has been an effort in Congress to set up a coal monopoly in the Powder River Basin.

Back in 2003, an amendment was offered in the House of Representatives to the “Energy Security Act of 2003” that only failed by four votes. H.R.6 would have, in the words of (ranking Democrat) Rep. Nick Rahall; “These provisions would allow coal producers with Federal leases to seize unlimited additional Federal coal lands without competitive bidding and be relieved of paying royalties owed to the American taxpayer ... The net effect of these provisions would be the creation of a Federal coal producing monopoly in the Powder River Basin.”


Power lines with Southern Nevada Water Authority complex in distance

So, with the possibility of astronomically rising coal prices, why aren't the utility companies worried about hikes in the price of coal? Because, ultimately, they won't have to pay them - the ratepayers will. And more insidiously, increases in fuel expenses are actually a good excuse for the utility companies to raise their rates.


Profit charts

Here is a hypothetical example: Let's say a unit of some fuel costs a dollar. For sake of ease of calculations, let's say that that dollar's worth of fuel results in two dollars worth of electricity. Obviously, these aren't real numbers. But this example is to show you why the power companies may want the price of fuel to rise. Let's say the price of this fuel goes up by 10 percent – 10 cents per unit. The power company would be thus justified in raising their electricity prices too. Let's say they raise their prices by 10 percent also. But 10 percent of 2 dollars is 20 cents. In this example; for every 10 cents fuel price rise, the power company gets an additional 10 cents of profit! This could add up to hundreds of millions of dollars, when your selling billions of dollars of electricity. Of course, in the real world things aren't this simple. But don't be surprised if this extra profit potential might be the hidden reason power companies aren't all that interested in free fuel for their power generation.


Global Warming photos

One other thing. You're tax dollars are helping the power companies to build these coal fired power plants. "Between 1950 and 1997, the coal industry received more than US$70 billion in federal subsidies, or nearly $1.5 billion a year. In 2005, Congress approved an additional $7.8 billion for coal." Your tax money is going to subsidize the fossil fuel industry – while alternative energy inventors, with the better ideas, are systematically excluded. Our tax money is being spent to perpetuate an antiquated, polluting, and price gouging energy system – and that's just how old money wants it.


China air pollution

So, just how bad does our situation have to get before Americans act? Does our environment have to be worse than China's before we decide that we're environmentalists. You can wait. But, what's the point in being an environmentalist after our environment has collapsed. Many scientists are now saying that we have to act on Global warming within the next ten years, or the Earth won't be able to heal itself. And when they say we have to act, they mean you.

We are the customers. We have the influence, if we choose to use it. If you are willing to commit to safe and sustainable power, let the utility companies know. Write them. They need to know how many customers they might lose if they commit to the construction of unsafe and unsustainable power. If enough of us are willing to do what it takes – even build our own power generators, if necessary; the utility companies cannot ignore us.


Wind map of Nevada showing Spring Valley as quite windy

We have better options. Options that utilize the kinetic energy of the Earth. Wind, sun, geothermal, and wave power are free for the taking. The initial costs might... might be higher. But... You're probably not driving the cheapest car you can buy. You're probably not living in the cheapest house you can find. You're probably not eating the cheapest food. Why would we even consider decades of dirty, dangerous, and even ecocidal power generation just because our utility companies want the highest profits at the cheapest up front cost?

New designs continue be developed that increase windmills' efficiency, reliability, and decrease their costs. Energy storage systems, utilizing technology such as flywheels or compressed air, are becoming even more practical. And don't believe the hype that fossil fuels are always cheaper.

As an example; Xcel Energy, a local utility in Colorado, has already charged less for wind generated electricity than that generated from fossil fuel. We have seen gas prices rise. We have seen natural gas prices rise. We will see coal prices rise. The price of wind and sunlight will always be free. Investors have recently realized this.

The stock market value of all of the larger renewable energy firms has recently doubled.

Part of the reason for investor enthusiasm is that new alternative power technology keeps being developed. Substantial advances in photo voltaic solar cells have been made recently. Solar energy is now cheaper and more practical than ever. The company Nanosolar now has a factory that will mass produce solar panels that will generate electricity cheaper than coal or nuclear.


Solar panels on rooftops

Of course, widely distributed solar power generators don't lend themselves well to the utility companies' desire to mass produce and control the distribution of power. The best place to put solar panels is on rooftops, because no additional land is required. But if everyone were to have solar panels on their roofs, generating their own electricity, there would be less of a need for big centralized power companies. Consequently, you can expect conventional power companies to tell us that distributed power generation is impractical, no matter how it's generated. They want to control supply.

A new type of power company has grown out of this dilemma. This power company, Citizenrē, rents solar cells. Citizenrē Corporation pays for, installs, owns, and operates the solar installation. All you are required to do is pay for the electricity generated from these panels, at a fixed rate that is at or below your current electricity price.


Coral Bleaching

As the price of electricity generated by fossil fuels continues to rise, the public will become ever more willing to commit to solar energy. In fact, this may be the unintended driving force behind the conventional utility companies' desire to generate the cheapest power possible, no matter what the environmental cost. Evidently, coal can't compete any other way.

The big risk for conventional utility companies is that, by committing to decades of coal fired power, they will be stuck with antiquated technology. As the price of coal rises, which is virtually inevitable, they could lose billions. Unless, of course, the American government has guaranteed their power plant loans or subsidizes their industry even more. If so; the American public will be stuck with the bill for the utility companies' poor decisions... The truth is; we already are.

You may be familiar with the term corporate welfare. These big business' hidden agenda is for taxpayers and ratepayers to burden the risk.


Mountain top removal coal mining in Virgina

Conventional business thinking in our economy is to privatize the profits, and socialize the costs. Conventional economic thinking is to only be concerned with the bottom line of a myopic and outdated accounting system.


Spring Valley

Conventional thinking even has Southern Nevada Water Authority convinced that they should drill for 200,000 acre feet of water a year in the desert, pipe it for up to 250 miles, and power the whole operation with coal fired power plants. Conventional thinking has us draining our nation's water reserves, intensifying Global warming, and destroying our rural areas. It's time to start thinking outside of the box. Someday, short term profits for a few at the expense of our communities will be a crime. Someday soon, coal fired power plants will have to pay a carbon tax. Unfortunately, Rural Nevada can't afford to wait for someday. But, the good news is this is just a matter of choice. All our society has to do is make the commitment to do what is right.


Thermal Solar Power/Desalination plant

A thermal solar power plant is being built in Boulder City, Nevada by a company called Solargenix. This solar power plant does not rely on photo voltaics. Instead, concentrating mirrors focus light onto oil that heats water to steam in a conventional turbine – resulting in “the lowest cost solar energy that can be produced today.” What is especially appealing about this type of design is that the water can also be desalinated. If Nevada were to install these thermal solar power plants along the coast, we could supply California with desalinated water in exchange for a larger allotment of the Colorado River – which could eliminate Southern Nevada's need to take water from Rural Nevada, and also the need to build coal fired power plants.


Cruise ships

Solar desalination is not the only option, though. For years, reverse osmosis desalination has been accomplished routinely on cruise ships. The equipment is already available for offshore desalination for coastal cities.


Spanish Desalination Plant

In fact, an offshore desalination plant already exists off the coast of Greece and on islands in the Baltic Sea and off the coast of Spain. Here in the US; an offer to build offshore desalination plants on ships off the coast of Monterey, California, is already being considered.


Saudi Desalination Plant

Conventional desalination plants are built on the coast, usually with their own dedicated power plant nearby. The primary draw back of reverse osmosis desalination is that the process presently requires a lot of energy. But these limitations are being overcome.


New Reverse Osmosis membranes – Desalination plans for Monterey Bay

New breakthroughs have already been published in scientific journals. In fact, by the time the proposed Groundwater Development pipeline network into Rural Nevada is built, it will likely be cheaper to desalinate sea water. Especially since deep wells often draw saline water, which might add the cost of desalination to the cost of drilling, pumping, and piping Rural Nevada's water away.


Desalination unit - Wave power generators

If Southern Nevada were to build a fleet of desalination units on barges with electricity from wave power generators, not only would their costs be stable for decades to come, but they would sometimes have excess power to sell. Most importantly, however, there would be far less damage to the environment.


Schell Creek Range

We know that there are only so many natural places left on the planet. There are only so many natural resources left to exploit. We are starting to realize that allowing others to squander the last of our natural wealth for a quick profit is not best for us in the long run. Its time to vote with our pocketbooks.


Google Complex – solar panels – windmills

There is a trend developing. Since Google installed photo voltaic solar panels on their office complex, other companies have noticed the good will the company has received.

Wal Mart is now considering installing as much as 100 MW of solar generated power over the next five years. Some may accuse Wal Mart of just trying to improve their tarnished image. But... every company should be trying to improve their image. The most important asset of a brand is its likability. And people like companies that live to a higher standard than they themselves do. Wal Mart has realized that solar panels on the ceiling speak louder than any radio ad, solar panels say more than any newspaper ad, and what they say – is that Wal Mart cares. Any company can follow the Google example, and the result is the same; a more likable company. There is a trend developing that companies could join – to improve their image, by doing something worthy of improving their image. Solar panels and windmills could end up being like billboards, without words, that undeniably say to the public; we intend to do everything we can to make the world of the future a better place.

There is hope, if we take the initiative.