In case you hadn't
noticed, Mr. Mitchell has presented a very one-sided
argument. His Editorial really could have used a counterpoint
from a different perspective. And actually, I think they had one –
that I sent as a Letter to the Editor – that didn't get published –
not even online.
You can find my
unpublished (by the Ely Times) LTE at NoShootFoot.blogspot.com
My LTE presented our
energy issues looking forward to what we can do – unlike Mr.
Mitchell's Editorial, which looks backwards at what we should have
done. And by the way; renewables haven't cost three to four times as
much as gas or coal-fired power in 30 years! I'm reading that
renewables are on par or even cheaper in some places.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-04-14/fossil-fuels-just-lost-the-race-against-renewables
And I was reading in
Motley Fool that the real reason Las Vegas casinos are leaving
NVEnergy is; “that Nevada has plenty of sunshine and lots of land
to build solar fields to provide energy that is cheaper than buying
power from the utility.”
But what the naysayers to
renewable energy so often leave out is that eventually the private
owner of say, solar panels, will eventually generate the equivalent
power to pay for their system – and from then on their power is
effectively free. And solar panels last a long time. There are solar
cells built in the 1950's still working.
The Ely Times has been
very accommodating to me in the past, and has published every LTE I
have sent them in the past 10 years. I thank them for that, and hope
that readers' opinions continue to be important to the newspaper.