Monday, May 21, 2007

Omissions, Oversights, and Lies

Here are a few things –

from the draft Environmental Impact Statement from LS Power / Dynegy / White Pine Energy Associates Limited Liability Corporation that you need to know:

Page 4-225 during the construction phase “it is estimated that about 10 workers of the unemployed work force ... would qualify for Station-related jobs ... it is estimated that an average of 40 jobs ... would be filled by local residents”

Page 4-240 notes “approximately 135 full and part time staff” Some of those 40 jobs will only be part time.

Page 4-240 “The tax revenue benefits generated by the Station would likely change the county's status from a guaranteed tax importer to a tax export county” This likely means that Clark County would not only avoid being polluted for energy it will consume, but will also get some of the tax revenue for it.

Page 4-234 “there would be an initial delay between the start of construction and when the (tax) revenue would become available to the County.” In other words, when we will need the money the most, during construction; there won't be any. This will likely mean a hike in our taxes. LS Power has offered to loan money to us, but only if they get a reduction in taxes later. In the long run, that would just mean we would be giving them a tax break – when tax revenue is the primary reason we're even considering this.

Page 4-225 states that “1200 workers” will be here “during peak construction” and

Page 4-237 estimates that “115 to 144 school age children” will reside here. That is approximately one child for every 10 workers. No way. This page also omits any financial help the county will get for education and schools during construction.

Page 4-235 shows no commitment to law enforcement help in McGill or Ely.

Page 4-236 shows no commitment to fire protection and ambulance in McGill or Ely – even though 300 to 1200 construction workers may be commuting from there.

Page 4-205 shows no commitment to helping with road maintenance.

Page 4-217 states “No people would be displaced as a result of implementing the Proposed Action (the coal-fired power plant)” I have spoke with a number of people who intend to move away if this plant is built. My next door neighbor already has his house up for sale. This coal-fired pollution generator will essentially stop the county's retirement community growth.

Table 4.6-8 lists 70 dangerous chemicals that will be emitted by this coal-fired power plant. Yet, the EIS devotes only two pages (pages 4-85 and 4-86) to the effects of air pollution – which only covers five pollutants.

Page 4-276 states “minimal air quality impacts would occur during Station construction” but very notably says nothing about air quality during operation.

Page 4-17 notes that the coal-fired power plant will be “15 miles from the Goshute Canyon Wilderness, 17 miles from the Bristlecone Wilderness, 12 miles from the Becky Peak Wilderness, and 13 miles from the High Schells Wilderness” and yet Page 4-172 states “the project is anticipated to have little or no effect on ... visitation rates” Bull---- Obviously, tourism will fall precipitously.

Page 4-282 (table 4.22-1) lists hazardous and solid wastes left by this coal-fired power plant to be both reversible and retrievable. Nonsense. How could they put the chemicals back? And just because they intend to cover them with a little dirt obviously doesn't make things as good as new.

Page 4-277 states “Some hazardous materials would be stored on the power plant site.”
This has got to be the understatement of the next 50 years! All of those toxic chemicals they intend to keep from emitting into the atmosphere will end up in a massive toxic waste “storage facility” for Nevada to keep... forever.

Page 4-175 states “the probability of an accidental release of a hazardous substance in the Northern Nevada Railway corridor ... would be expected to be low.” Maybe, but that omits the likelihood that the railway will be used to import other hazardous waste for permanent storage in White Pine County. If that happens, the probability of an accidental release increases substantially.

In Conclusion:

There is an obvious reason LS Power has created a Limited Liability Corporation to construct and operate this coal-fired power plant. They expect for us to someday sue them.

LS Power/Dynegy intend to take our public land and pollute it.

Sure, they'll pay for the property where the (100 foot tall, 200 acre) toxic waste storage facility and the (90 acre) toxic sludge evaporation pond will be – but likely so that they won't have to live by BLM rulings.

Of course, that's all they've ever claimed they would do – just what they were forced to by law – while taking as much wealth out of this County that they can.

In the past few years, we've heard reports of lobbyists writing the laws.

Can we trust that the EPA will have the authority to enforce our environmental laws?

We've heard stories of the gutting of the EPA. This looks pretty apparent, when we consider the fact that Limited Liability Corporations are still getting the go ahead to build coal-fired power plants – when we have safer, cleaner, and cheaper options (in the long run).


alex said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
alex said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
alex said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
alex said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.