I just recently learned
the obvious; Adolph Hitler didn't just dream up the idea for the Nazi
Concentration Camps. He had examples. And one of the best examples of
the time was American Indian Reservations of the 19th century. From that revelation, I eventually realized that our
civilization, by accepting the existence of our faults and adapting,
can avoid a lot of misery and death.
Adolph Hitler did not grow
up in a vacuum. I hear he was a big fan of stories of the American
West. Even if he wasn't a fan, he had to have known about American
Indians. He had to have heard some stories of the “conquest” of the American West. And he had to have known about the forced marches
to “Reservations.” Maybe this is why so many traits of the Nazi
Concentration Camps resembled American Indian Reservations.
The continued existence of
American Indian Reservations is a time proven example that certain
“undesirable” people can be rounded up and forced to leave
desirable places. It is also true that if this “ethnic cleansing”
is done with a callus hand, many of these “undesirable” people
will starve, get sick, and die.
It isn't hard to imagine
some despot studying American history and determining that the forced
relocation of Native Americans to Reservations was a success. And it
isn't that much harder to realize that some truly evil people might
even view all the resultant starvation, illness and death as a
desirable consequence.
...Hey, the goal was to
get rid of them.
It's one thing to think
that American Indian Reservations were no better than some Nazi
Concentration Camps. It's another thing to realize that Hitler was
likely inspired by American Indian Reservations to
create the Nazi Concentration Camps.
The similarities are
uncanny. But there are Americans who will not be willing to compare
America to Nazi Germany. They don't want to believe that Americans
could be that evil. No rational argument will convince them. They
just won't believe it. Nonetheless, the forcing of Native Americans
onto “Reservations” happened – a lot of innocent people died –
and all of them were rendered politically impotent. Which proves it's not just Nazis we have to
fear, it's the capacity of human nature towards monumental evil and
indifference.
...And if Indian
Reservations of the 1800's don't sound like Nazi Concentration Camp
prototypes to you, well... you've never been forced onto a
Reservation.
So, why hasn't this
obvious revelation not been brought up more? Americans simply don't
want to think about it. The potential for America (the good guys) to
be evil on a mass scale simply doesn't fit into our self-image. We're
supposed to be about freedom. But we don't want to think about the
obvious fact that some powerful Americans feel they should have the
“freedom” to oppress. (Examples: slavery, sweat shops, election
rigging, union busting, bailouts, looting of pension funds, and today's student loans)
This habit we have of
looking away from painful truth has made Americans easy to
manipulate. Face it; if you don't want to face the truth, it's easy
to distract you from the truth.
I've heard that the
greatest crime most of us ever commit is the crime of indifference.
We just want our problems
to go away. And if somebody else handles that, whatever they do, we
usually don't ask questions. The super-greedy-rich are no different.
But they have the power to really mess
things up. And it looks like that's just what they did. To some
extent, the indifference of the rich led to the “ethnic cleansing”
of the American West.
Consider this:
There was no Welfare back
before and during the Gilded age. The poor were just encouraged to go
away... “Go West.” This emigration served as a pressure relief
valve for Eastern U.S. society. If the desperate didn't like it
there, they didn't have to riot or revolt. They could just leave. In
fact, when all the other desperate souls were leaving too, there was
no one left to organize a revolution with. This left the
super-greedy-rich in control. And what did they do? They manipulated
the laws so they could get even richer – now.
Herein lies the key to the
fatal flaw of our civilization:
So many of us want it all
– now.
...And very rarely can one
get it “all, now” fairly, conscientiously, and sustainably. Which
means some of us are willing to cheat, overcharge, cut corners, and
ignore the consequences of our actions.
Back in the 1800's, the
consequence of encouraging the poor to go away was that their
desperation was just felt elsewhere.
The Native Americans who
were in the way of this Westward migration of “legal” immigrants
were literally in the way. Consequently, Native
Americans were encouraged to go away too – at gunpoint.
So... My point is:
America had to suffer
through the Native American “Holocaust” because the
super-greedy-rich didn't want to help the poor.
Does any of this sound
familiar?
(As I write this, certain
Tea Party members of our American Congress have shut down our
Government in an attempt to deny poor people health care.)
Have you ever wondered why
Native Americans were not considered American citizens until 1932?
Immigrants could become Americans. And anyone of European descent
born in America was automatically considered American. But if your
skin was brown, even if your ancestors had been here from time
immemorial, you were essentially a foreigner. Sure, a whole lot of
that was racism. But racism usually has more to do with struggles for
resources than we'd like to admit.
Obviously, the people with
guns wanted what the people without guns had. But more insidiously;
the people in power wanted an empire – and they wanted other people
to take it for them – preferably for free. So, they sent off the
poor to do their dirty work.
By telling the poor to “go
West,” the super-greedy-rich could get rid of their poverty issues
locally and later lay claim to some of the mineral, water, and land
wealth the poor whites took for them in the West. We still see the
results of this today with massive mines on “public” land –
owned by far-away corporations who hardly pay any taxes or royalties
to anyone – including the U.S. Government.
What we have here is
systematic exploitation that has existed since before the United
States was even formed. And though the U.S. Bill of Rights was a huge
improvement over monarchy, there still exists huge loopholes for the
super-greedy to take advantage of others.
It didn't have to be that
way. Native Americans could have been given a route to citizenship.
The promise of freedom, democracy, justice, rule of law, and liberty
is an inspiring expectation. Some Native Americans did try to become
U.S. citizens – the Cherokee, for example. But they found no
justice. The rule of law always ruled against them. And worse; the
only thing they were free to do was leave – the Cherokee got
forced, at gunpoint, off to Reservations (proto-concentration camps) in Oklahoma.
If 19th Century
America had been a just democracy, they would have allowed Native
Americans citizenship under certain conditions. But, 19th
century America would then have had to respect some
Native American rights. Of course, to the super-greedy, no
Native American rights were better than some. You see; the
super-greedy-rich don't do sharing. That's how they stay rich.
Once you really think
about it, it shouldn't be any surprise at all that Hitler modeled the
Nazi Concentration Camps after American Indian Reservations.
Do I think the
super-greedy-rich actually planned the mass exodus of poverty and
dissent and the ethnic cleansing and “Holocaust” of those who
might otherwise be considered legal owners to wealth the
super-greedy-rich coveted? Yes. Absolutely. They even bragged about
it, like it was God's will. They called it “Manifest Destiny.”
Now; think about Hitler's Aryan (master) race propaganda and his
claim that it was their destiny to rule the World. If you don't see a
cause and effect here, you must believe Hitler never studied history.
So, my next point is:
If we hadn't
allowed the super-greedy-rich to get
their way so often; we might have missed out on a history of misery,
war, poverty, and oppression.
But that was all in the
distant past, right? Well, not really. Just a couple of years ago, a
multi-State coordinated government police action was used to force
the Occupy movement off the streets.
In spite of the fact that
many Americans don't want to accept it, this is how our government
deals with dissent. And by the way, notice this footage was only
aired on RT (Russia Today). I'll bet you never saw anything like this
on Fox “News” or MSNBC. They're too busy going on
and on and on about the next practically meaningless “election”
of pre-picked candidates.
(Of course, no masses of
Occupy people were killed or forced into concentration camps. But a
number of people were unjustly spied upon, injured by police, and the U.S. has the highest incarceration
per capita in the world.)
Which brings us to why
the Occupy movement was there. Though I did not join the Occupy
movement, I did agree with their premiss that wealth was unfairly
being concentrated at the top at the expense of the poor and the
middle class.
What we have been seeing
for the past 30 years is the middle class being driven to poverty and
the poor being economically forced into ghettos. Moreover, we see the
poor without adequate health care.
Senator Alan Greyson
exclaimed, during the debates on the Affordable Health Care Act
(Obamacare) while it was a Bill in Congress, that over 40,000
Americans die every year without adequate health care.
Now think about this;
“undesirables” are being economically forced into ghettos and
left to die. This is not quite Nazi Concentration Camps, but the
similarities are disturbing.
Do we have fascists in our
midst? The Tea Party claims to be “Libertarians.” But if they
were really Libertarians, they would be threatening to shut down the
Government to end things like the billions of dollars in subsidies to
the super-rich oil companies. That's never going to happen, because
the biggest financial backer to the Tea Party are the Koch brothers
(oil men).
So... here in America; the
super-greedy-rich have manipulated our Government to unfairly enrich
the big monopolies at the expense of the citizens of the United
States. The rich are getting richer. The poor are getting poorer. The
poor have been economically forced into ghettos. And thousands of the
poor die every year because they don't have adequate health care.
Mussolini is credited with
claiming that it shouldn't be called “Fascism,” and that it would
be more accurate to call it “Corporatism.”
I see a pattern here. No
one is being forced at gun point into Reservations or Concentration
Camps, but scores of people are suffering and dying unnecessarily. And astonishingly, the Tea Party is willing to shut down our Government to
see that this continues. I see that Fascism is alive and well in
America, and these Fascists are willing to cripple our Government to
get their way. They want Obama to fail. That means they want America
to fail. That is just shy of treason. At the very least, where are
the recall elections?
It probably sounds by now
that I thoroughly distrust the rich. No. Like every other group of
people, quite a diversity of opinion exists. I'm sure many rich
Americans thought the forceful expulsion of Native Americans off
their own land was a serious crime. I thank them for keeping things
here in America from getting as bad as Nazi Germany.
However, I suspect most of
the rich never really thought much about the consequences of these
unfair monopolistic proto-fascist actions. If you choose to view
greed as an addiction to money, it's easy to see that the
super-greedy only pay attention to the money. Sure, they knew about
the horrific treatment of Native Americans, but they didn't care.
Sure, they know about the horrific health care issues of today. But
they don't think that's their problem. They only care about their
profits and their losses. It's like they're in a casino.
Ironically enough, one can
go to any Indian Casino these days and see essentially what I'm
talking about. The addicted gamblers there only care about winning
and losing. While they're playing the games, nothing
else matters.
When we see this
compulsively focused behavior in casinos, we recognize it as an issue
– or even a mental illness. But we resist the comparison to the
super-greedy-rich allowing others to suffer so that they can profit.
We've been convinced that somehow the rich are better than us. We've
been convinced that the rich are smarter than us. In fact, most of us
would accept the richest 1% running the world – if they were
benevolent. But that is so obviously not the case – and addiction
to money is the key issue here. The super-greedy-rich are treating
our economy like a Ponzi scheme casino. Collectively, they simply
don't care about anything or anyone else.
The super-greedy have the
power to pillage, to subvert democracies, and to eventually create a
Hell on Earth. But they just don't seem to have the power to fix
things. The reality is they only care about money.
We need to figure out a
way to make them care about what really matters...
before the consequences of their actions come back to hurt (or even
kill) us all.
We need to figure out a
better system.
What would that system
look like?
- It would still have the Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution.
- It would include provisions of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
- It would include provisions of the Declaration on Principles of International Law Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in Accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.
- It would have much more direct democracy.
- It would have to have at least one public news outlet not controlled by the wealthy.
- Its economy would be more focused on sustainability than growth.
- Its most powerful people would be more focused on personal happiness than oppressing others.
- And there would likely be an additional reward system that gives people status outside of the monetary system.
And if we don't fix
things?
America will continue to
become more and more of a banana republic.
There will still be the
super-greedy-rich, but they will be hiding away behind walled and
gated communities so that they won't be attacked or kidnapped. Their
air will be polluted. Their food will be tainted. Their travel will
be restricted to only other walled communities. They will see hate in
the eyes of everyone who isn't rich. And their happiness will be far from maximized. But they'll still be maximizing their profits at the
expense of others – and life on Earth. Of course, this will only be
a temporary situation.
Sooner or later, the cost
of taking things is higher than the value of what you want to take.
...This is what eventually
happened to Adolph Hitler.
the cost of taking over the Soviet Union wasn't worth the loss of Nazi troops.
...This is what eventually will happen to the Tea Party.
the cost of shutting down the government isn't worth the loss of our economy.
the cost of taking over the Soviet Union wasn't worth the loss of Nazi troops.
...This is what eventually will happen to the Tea Party.
the cost of shutting down the government isn't worth the loss of our economy.
...This is what is now happening to our Environment.
the cost of looting the Earth isn't worth living in a wasted dump.
the cost of looting the Earth isn't worth living in a wasted dump.
No comments:
Post a Comment